Cancer risk? 5G wireless speeds could be dangerous

The wireless industry is rolling out powerful 5G technology throughout the United States. However, some studies show a link between cell phone radiation and cancer.


The Opioid Epidemic: A Deliberate Policy (Must watch and share)

To effectively deal with today’s opioid crisis, you have to confront the fact that the mass drugging of the American people has been a deliberate policy, the British Empire’s new Opium War, to create an environment in which everyday drug usage is normal. Because a doped up population is content and servile. Once that’s clear, we can break from the system of British control, and address why our people are in such despair by rebuilding our economy.

Dr. Leszczynski Sounds Warning at Australian Meeting: Precaution with 5G

Assumption of Safety for 5G by Government Agencies, No Science.

A sober warning about the safety of 5G technology was sounded by Dr. Dariusz Leszczynski, Adjunct Professor of Biochemistry Division of Biochemistry and Biotechnology University of Helsinki, Finland,  at a recent international meeting in Australia. The 5th Asian and Oceanic IRPA Regional Congress on Radiation Protection (AOCRP-5) was held in Melbourne, Australia, May 20 – 23, 2018. Several presentations focused on 5G technology and non-ionizing radiation safety. While many supported the current safety guidelines, which like 2G, 3G and 4G technologies, are based on heat and not biological effects, the presenters were in general agreement that there was a lack of scientific research on 5G.

Dr. Leszczynski, who researches non-ionizing radiation, emphasized,  there is a continuous talk about assuring that the 5G maintains low levels of EMF exposure. However, there is not sufficient scientific research to show what low levels assure no health effects in short- and long-term exposures (acute and chronic exposures).It seems that the telecom industry assumes that their low level exposures will not cause- never -any health effects and telecom industry forcefully imposes this scientifically unsupported assumption on others, especially governmental decision-makers. Mentioned above “realistic public exposure levels” and “low EMF levels” have no basis in scientific research on biological effects predominantly because such research has not been done.”

Dr. Leszczynski urges that the Precautionary Principle be applied before the rollout of 5G.

Dr. Leszczynski has reported on this meeting at REPORT  from the AOCRP -5. His  closing words are below.

There is an urgent need to start research studies examining effects of millimeter-waves on human health. However, there is a strong resistance from the telecom industry and from the decision-makers to start new research programs. ICNIRP and the telecoms strongly propagate the idea that the low power of EMF emissions from the 5G devices will guarantee that human health will not be affected.

However, the same assurances were made in 70’s when the first generation of cell phones was commercialized, followed by the unlimited spread of the 2G, 3G and 4G devices – as long as the device emits radiation within the ICNIRP guidelines it is considered as safe, what is not necessarily the case as shown by a number of research studies. As a direct consequence of the scientific research, in 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified radiation emitted by the cell phones and cell towers as a possible human carcinogen. This classification appears to be strengthened by the new research studies on 3G and 4G-emitted EMF published after year 2011. However, what the biomedical research on millimeter-waves, performed in the future, will show is a complete enigma.

However, no matter what the future research will show, the 5G technology will be by then fully deployed and without any possibility of reverse because the whole future life of the humanity will be based and dependent on the functioning of the 5G radiation-emitting devices. This is a unique situation in the history of the human kind when the whole human population will be exposed to man-made devices emitting non-ionizing radiation that was insufficiently tested before deployment. What is and what will be the responsibility of the scientists, decision-makers and industry leaders who permit deployment of insufficiently tested technology that will affect us all? The answer is simple – no responsibility… because if any health problems will show up in the future, these will most likely take tens of years of time to manifest and, by then the persons that currently enable deployment of insufficiently tested radiation-emitting 5G technology will be retired or the proverbial “six feet under”.  Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, DSc

CBS News Report: 5G Cell Towers in Piedmont

News report January 2018 on 5G cell towers being placed in Piedmont. Over 180 Scientists are calling for a moratorium on 5G due to the lack of premarket testing and older evidence of harm. This report highlights the fact that firefighters have an exemption from cell towers being placed on their fire stations due to health effects found in the firefighters when cell towers were installed.

Dr. Leszczynski speaking at a 2009 congressional hearing on mobile phone radiation

For other information on 5G

5G Telecommunications Science PST

5G Mobile Communications PST

Broadband Expansion PST

Doctors and Scientists Demand Moratorium on 5G- SaferEMR

5G and the IoT: Scientific Overview of Human Health Risks – EH Trust


source read more


InPower Movement: A NEW strategy to push back against the dangerous spread of smart meters and 5G technology

The InPower Docu-Series illustrates a powerful new method to restore social justice and accountability. Episode #1 focuses on solving the ‘smart’ meter problem: how we can prevent and reverse the installation of this dangerous technology, through holding corporate executives and government actors financially accountable — for the first time ever. And in so doing, we can restore safety in our homes, and bring balance to our world.
STREAM EPISODE #1:   Watch on YouTube | Watch/Download EP#1 on Vimeo
STREAM TAKE BACK YOUR POWER 2017: Watch on | Watch on Vimeo
OTHER VIEWING OPTIONS:   See the InPower Trailer | See a Preview Clip

(NaturalHealth365) Josh del Sol Beaulieu, the filmmaker who brought you the investigative “smart” grid documentary film Take Back Your Power, has teamed up with some extraordinary individuals to launch the InPower Movement, an actionable solutions-based follow-up offering a method to hold accountable those who continue to cause harm with smart meters and 5G technology.

The award-winning 2013 documentary film investigates the so-called “smart” utility meters and smart grid, revealing the shocking cost increases and corruption, privacy and surveillance, home fires, health effects, hacking vulnerability, and global agenda to place a “smart” meter on every home and business in the world. As part of the InPower launch, the team has just re-released Take Back Your Power 2017.

Watch “TAKE BACK YOUR POWER 2017” – Free viewing

Take Back Your Power uncovers the spiraling problems and harms behind the global “smart” grid agenda. In the few years since its world-wide release, viewers have been consistently shocked, dismayed, disillusioned, and outraged. They have widely shared the film, engaged in conversations, and publicly unveiled their own stories about how “smart” meters have negatively impacted their lives, their homes, and their health.The impact of this film has been transformative. People were awakened to the world-wide crisis in our midst, but also felt lost when confronting a broken leadership system. As the film’s creator, del Sol noticed that people were inspired to affect change, but felt disempowered in the face of an industry and a government that seemed to have gone off the rails. He says, “Now people know something is wrong. They want to fix it, but they don’t know how or where to start. People repeatedly asked me, ‘So, what can we do?’”

The InPower Movement is the answer to that question …

It presents a revolutionary new process of enforcing the individual commercial liability of corporate executives and government representatives who are causing egregious harm. As del Sol explains, “We are bringing power back to the people with an open source, crowd-funded movement that is of, by, and for the people. This is a societal solution, and anyone can take part, anywhere, whether you have a ‘smart’ or analog meter on your home.”

WATCH episode #1 of the INPOWER docu-series – below:

This is a fundamentally different paradigm of accountability.  And there are already indications that it works. Over the last two years, InPower ran a seed campaign with 200 participants in three regions, with impressive results. Del Sol says, “It is definitely to a paradigm shift, to realize that we have the power to change the decisions of high-level officials and executives who are involved in agendas causing harm.And if just a couple dozen (or less) of us can do that, then a few thousand (or hopefully more) can put an end to these 5G and other wireless agendas entirely.”

Cal Washington, InPower Strategic Director, explains in Episode One, “I’m trying to teach you how to play the game at their level. And this is what scares them. Because they have to take the liability.”

A significant development toward these goals comes out of Hawaii. In early 2017, Debra Greene PhD, health and environmental consultant, led a group in Hawaii to send several dozen Notices of Liability (and Non-Consent) to the Maui Electric president.

The parent company, Hawaiian Electric, had been planning on a blanket-installation of smart meters throughout multiple islands. But, in a sudden reversal, Hawaiian Electric recently announced their complete shift to an “opt-in” plan, in which the utility must receive explicit consent from the homeowner in order to install a ‘smart’ meter.

Greene reports that they also strangely denied ever having a plan for blanket installation, despite it previously being public knowledge.

Watch the 20-minute video podcast on the liability action in Hawaii:

InPower’s roadmap includes a website functioning as a hub for individuals, groups, and communities, a place where people can come together, discuss the issues, support the movement, and most importantly, take action. They have also boldly announced intentions to adapt their process to help solve other critical problems where harm is being done.On InPower’s current site, they have already freely posted the very same document templates and guides used by their seed groups to considerable effect, for any utility customers that want to use them. And they aim to offer a next-level participant experience.

Different in scope than other action-related processes, the website provides everything that is needed to move through the process. The steps are straight-forward and free. Their Action Center will provide interactive video content and tutorials, support options, and semi-automated generation your customized documents.

InPower’s “Phase 2” goal is to simplify, support, and expand the liability action against 5G technology.  They are currently running an Indiegogo crowd-funding campaign through September 3, 2017 to help complete development and launch the next phase.

Del Sol explains, “This is about reclaiming our future, for ourselves and our families. Those in so-called positions of power are putting profits before people – this is painfully obvious now. Until now there hasn’t been any real remedy, due to the collusion between industry, government and the corporatized justice system.”

“But as their language is money, a powerful motivator for action can be commercial liability. Until now, it hasn’t been common knowledge how we can actually properly use the system of commerce to balance the scales.”

“Because of the critically-important window of time we’re in, we are actually giving all of our work away for free – and trusting that as people catch on to what we’re doing, they’ll want to see it grow. As each of our ‘seed’ groups have obtained results, we are initiating a new method of accountability in our world. We invite everyone who resonates with this desire to take part in our free educational resources and action process.”

Take action today. Start here to InPower yourself

After watching Episode #1, go to, and subscribe your email for access to Episode #2, next steps and updates.

Share the InPower website & videos!

Consider backing InPower’s next phase, on IndieGogo.

InPower is about awareness, action, and conscious revolution. As del Sol reflects, “Coming into our power is indeed a profound shift. I believe it is time we write a better story – and that is what we are setting out to do.”

About the author: Alison Main is a freelance writer with an expertise in environmental health, electromagnetic safety, chemical safety and tech addiction. Her published work has appeared in Paleo Magazine, Best Self Magazine, Notre Dame Magazine, News of Pelham, and Read more at

Gateshead Government UK Councillors Code of Conduct & Injunction Against Mark Steele on 5G

stop 5 g

August 6, 2018

Gateshead Council
Civic Center
Regent Street

Corporate Services and Governance

Att: Mike Barker, Strategic Director

Re: Critical Information Regarding Council’s Conduct Regarding 5G & Proposed Injunction Against Mark Steele

Dear Mr. Barker:

It has come to my attention that the Gateshead Council is seeking an Injunction against Mark Steele speaking against 5G. I was asked to respond in my qualified capacity and in the best interests of all parties.

I can not summarize the 15,000 hours of objective investigation that went into wireless EMFs as applied, it is important council hold me accountable. Mike Steele should be applauded for stepping up for his community, countrymen, Royal Family, Queen’s assets and international community against this extremely dangerous technology as applied.

Radio Frequency EMFs or wireless technology is considered innovative but that consideration happened because critical science was admitted to be missing in exposure codes globally. Causation and biological plausibility linking RF EMFs to adverse health effects was admitted to be missing. That missing causal evidence should have been found before mass deployment of wireless first. Unrealized catastrophic consequences and liabilities have been created by governments and industries moving forward with critical science admitted to be missing.

That missing causal evidence was found and reported through different jurisdictions but those jurisdictions including the ex Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper didn’t share the science. That undermined Canada as well as the United Nations creating liability in the trillions of dollars.

The Specific Absorption Rate test used for the limits of human exposure is a plastic head or body part with liquid in it. The name with “absorption” in it is an admission of harm.
This isn’t a debate and your council is relying on a plastic head with liquid in it to supersede all sciences and jurisdictions including medicine,

Due to the fact I was a Registered Intervener in FortisBC application for wireless meters, I was provided the legal avenue by the BCUC to reverse 2 smart meter programs in BC, Canada. That will have a domino effect globally.

Covering the planet with 5G will kill the planet and unrealized hell is coming. The UK and others should be horrified exposure codes admit they are inducing electrical current into people. There is no acceptable induction of current into a baby or adult.

The Reconsideration to reverse smart meter programs will be filed in Canada tomorrow and shared with the UK as well as others. Your council may want to defend 5G but it is indefensible. You can NOT put populations, buildings, infrastructure, ecosystems and atmosphere inside a man made microwave oven. There is nothing on the planet electrically compatible with these EMFs except portable devices. Here are the Reconsideration criteria by the BC Government. It has to be proven the BCUC made an error or exceeded jurisdictions to which both apply.

Our jurisdictions and special interests in Canada have fought hard to defend their illegal investment, unfortunately they get to be liable now. Here is a letter that went to City of Kelowna and Council after FortisBC published an article of smart meter safety.
It is critical you follow all links.

This link is to a letter that went to FortisBC CEO. warning the CEO of a publicly traded company’s liability in my qualified capacity as their recognized expert.

This link is to the document calling for the immediate suspension of BC Hydro’s smart meter program. BC Hydro can defend the plastic head or disqualify electricity exists. The Auditor General of Canada and Lt. Governor representing the Queen’s assets will not be technically overwhelmed by the plastic head.

This link is specific to your council, health professionals and the MPs who are being lazy and negligent in the representation of the public on wireless. Constituents with valid health complaints are literally being tortured by these EMFs and told they are within the guidelines of EPH. Do you really have guidelines for how long you can put a baby in a microwave? Your EPH has guidelines for EMF exposure that can be confirmed trigger nerves and muscles, compromises nervous, hormonal and immune systems at the same time, induces current, changes cellular voltages, changes frequencies in the brain and body, high speed oscillations billions of times per measurable second, etc.

Your entire health system has been compromised from top to bottom,. The entire scope of medical diagnosis has changed except no one informed or consulted medicine globally. What is malpractice insurance and liability for populations misdiagnosed? The domino effect is across industries including education has changed. It is a national and international security issue that can be qualified.

The link is a letter from international health education administration about the accredited medical education program that lectured the missing causal evidence linking RF EMFs to adverse health effects. Your health professionals and EPH can see the accreditation for education credits required for ongoing medical licensing. That program was applicable to health professionals in North America. The contact information for the administrator is there and EPH should be contacting the admin to have an accredited medical program in the UK. There are no conflicts of interest and the health admin can answer any questions pertaining to content or faculty. It is the most advanced medical education in the world.

I want to bring the important submission to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to your attention. I was asked to do a submission by constituents in Ontario, Canada regarding an aging Nuclear Power Plants license extension.

The Commission’s responses have been political and negligent; the Auditor General of Canada and the Lt, Governor representing the Queen’s assets won’t accept that. The UK has nuclear power and the buildings as well as infrastructure are not designed to accommodate highly penetrating EMFs. The mechanism of interaction by EMFs requires a qualified electrical interpretation first. Once Civil Engineers understand the mechanism if interaction, the mechanisms of action are the atoms and molecules of the engineer’s expertise.

The links above contain precedent setting causal evidence, biological plausibility and critical errors admitted to be missing under oath by FortisBC experts for the BCUC application. FortisBC engineer Mark Warren called the mechanisms of interaction a hypothesis because he isn’t electrically qualified in any opinion. Dr. Yakov Shkolnikov confirmed the mechanisms of interaction as an electrical engineer.

Exponent Inc’s expert witnesses for FortisBC admitted in direct cross examination by me that 100% of all bioelectrical information was left out of their risk assessment report for Fortis.. The plastic head doesn’t have or represent biology.

The only design to stop EMFs is an MRI chamber.

I can’t apologize to the UK and other countries enough. Our jobs as the government’s professionals are to report to and through our authorities having jurisdiction. Those authorities including the Prime Ministers didn’t do their jobs.

Canada’s Ambassador to the UK Gordon Campbell didn’t do his job.

The US plan is to mass install 300,000 mini towers for the 5G grid. Killing your taxpayers, crops, economy and losing the tax base is a national and international security issue. President Trump doesn’t know what the previous political interests did. Mr Obama legacy will include the first African American President to put all races in a mad made microwave oven; Trump is making the ovens bigger.

The world shares one atmosphere, 300,000 mini towers affect every country. Heating the atmosphere from space has consequences like extreme weather unlike any seen, fires, floods, droughts, etc and it is already happening.

Gatehead Council should stop the Injunction application through the courts immediately. The plastic head and potato used by Boeing for Wi-Fi safety on aircraft is indefensible. Your buildings, infrastructure, etc is not designed to be in microwave ovens. The oscillations of atoms and molecules 180 degrees 1.8 billion times per second, 86,400 times a day is one antenna, wi-fi was 4.9 billion times per second.

The judge isn’t aware that 5G and those involved have exceeded jurisdiction. Mark Steele is actually trying to save council from themselves and the constituents they represent. This will be copied to Mark Steele and judge where I will provide the required expert witness on the topic for Gatehead, Mark and the courts.

This isn’t going to be popular with any council or industry, the real trade offs are liability without insurance plus criminal liability. If I didn’t state what I am in my qualified capacity, I would be liable and undermine Gateshead council which isn’t an option.

I look forward to answering any questions or challenges.



Professor Curtis Bennett

Chief, International Science Advisory Board for IHF(14,000 members)
Adjunct Professor for Accredited Medical Education For CME Credits
Thermal Radiation Consultant for 38 Years
Interprovincial Journeyman Electrician(Red Seal)
Building Construction Engineering Technologist
Ph: 604-239-2694

Bringing the Invisible to Light Since 1979”

Source read more

Ibuprofen increases the risk of cardiac arrest by 30% — why do people still believe that NSAIDs are safe?

Image: Ibuprofen increases the risk of cardiac arrest by 30% — why do people still believe that NSAIDs are safe?

(Natural News) One of the biggest mistakes many of us make when it comes to our healthcare choices is to divide the pharmacy into two sections in our minds: the over-the-counter, no limits, “safe” section; and the behind-the-counter, must have a prescription, “dangerous” section. It is very easy to conclude that not needing a prescription for a chemical drug means it’s safe and shouldn’t raise any red flags, but nothing could be further from the truth. There are some very dangerous medicines lurking in the over-the-counter section, as was confirmed again recently by a Danish study that found a link between the use of ibuprofen and a 31 percent increase in risk of cardiac arrest.

As reported by Natural Health 365, ibuprofen is viewed by many as a harmless painkiller and is taken by upwards of 30 million people each day to fight pain, fever or inflammation. It is part of a group of drugs known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the study, which was published in the European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, found that some other drugs in this class are even more dangerous than ibuprofen. Diclofenac, for example, which is commonly used to treat the pain associated with arthritis, was found to increase the risk of cardiac arrest by a staggering 50 percent.

Just because you don’t need a prescription doesn’t mean it’s safe

NSAIDs relieve pain by blocking pro-inflammatory enzymes known as COX-1 and COX-2. While this suppresses the body’s natural inflammatory response, thereby relieving symptoms like pain, it does nothing to eliminate the cause of that pain. And since these drugs interfere with platelet aggregation, they increase the risk of blood clots, raise blood pressure, constrict arteries and increase fluid retention. It is this toxic combination of symptoms that can trigger cardiac arrest in those who use these drugs, even if they have only used them for a short time. (Related: Painkillers commonly prescribed for arthritis are more dangerous than previously believed, especially for heart patients.)

Mother Nature’s micronutrient secret: Organic Broccoli Sprout Capsules now available, delivering 280mg of high-density nutrition, including the extraordinary “sulforaphane” and “glucosinolate” nutrients found only in cruciferous healing foods. Every lot laboratory tested. See availability here.

A press release by the European Society of Cardiology explains how the researchers arrived at their findings:

All patients who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark between 2001 and 2010 were identified from the nationwide Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Data was collected on all redeemed prescriptions for NSAIDs from Danish pharmacies since 1995. These included the non-selective NSAIDs (diclofenac, naproxen, ibuprofen), and COX-2 selective inhibitors (rofecoxib, celecoxib).

A case-time-control design was used to examine the association between NSAID use and cardiac arrest. …

A total of 28 947 patients had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark during the ten year period. Of these, 3 376 were treated with an NSAID up to 30 days before the event. Ibuprofen and diclofenac were the most commonly used NSAIDs, making up 51% and 22% of total NSAID use, respectively.

Use of any NSAID was associated with a 31% increased risk of cardiac arrest. Diclofenac and ibuprofen were associated with a 50% and 31% increased risk, respectively. Naproxen, celecoxib and rofecoxib were not associated with the occurrence of cardiac arrest, probably due to a low number of events.

Professor Gunnar H. Gislason, professor of cardiology at Copenhagen University Hospital, and the study’s lead author, warned that this study is a stark reminder that these drugs are “not harmless,” and that allowing them to be sold over-the-counter, without a prescription, sends the wrong safety message to consumers. He added that NSAIDs should be avoided by patients who have cardiovascular disease or other risk factors, and “should only be available at pharmacies, in limited quantities, and in low doses.”

Professor Gislason advises not exceeding 1,200mg of ibuprofen on any given day, and that the safest drug in this class is probably Naproxen.

This is by no means the first study to point out the dangers of NSAIDs. Earlier studies have confirmed additional risks, including an increased risk of intestinal bleeding. It does remind us, however, just how much better it is to avoid chemical drugs and try to treat pain and inflammation with natural alternatives instead.

Discover the latest breakthroughs in healthcare at

Sources include:

Local Resistance Builds to Google’s (5G)‘Smart City’ in Toronto

Biggest project by Alphabet’s Sidewalk Labs faces questions over who will handle residents’ personal data in the high-tech setting

Pedestrians use a path in the Port Lands, where Google-parent Alphabet is attempting to create a “smart city” on Toronto’s waterfront.
Pedestrians use a path in the Port Lands, where Google-parent Alphabet is attempting to create a “smart city” on Toronto’s waterfront.PHOTO: MARK BLINCH/REUTERS

TORONTO—An Alphabet Inc. GOOGL 0.47% project aimed at creating a “smart city” on Toronto’s waterfront is facing resistance from local officials who are worried about the development’s direction and how Google’s parent company will handle residents’ personal data.

The local friction has raised doubts about Alphabet’s inaugural attempt to use urban design and technology to tackle modern-day issues, such as expensive housing, traffic congestion and environmental sustainability.

The Toronto project is suffering from delays and the loss of key personnel. On Tuesday, the two bodies behind the project—Alphabet’s subsidiary Sidewalk Labs LLC and Waterfront Toronto, a Canadian government entity—said they expect to release a final development plan by next spring. That plan had been expected this November. Meanwhile, the chief executive of Waterfront Toronto, a supporter of Sidewalk, resigned in July, and a real-estate developer left Waterfront’s board this week because she was uncomfortable with Alphabet as a partner.

The early stumbles reflect the challenges of building new, high-tech land developments and illustrate the difficulties for-profit technology companies can encounter when working with municipal agencies responsible for safeguarding citizens’ privacy.

Sidewalk remains positive about the waterfront plan and its relationship with Toronto. “We have had the privilege of working with public servants at all three levels of government, and on the staff and board of Waterfront Toronto, to create a groundbreaking plan for Toronto’s waterfront,” the company said in an emailed statement.

Under the terms of a negotiating agreement issued on Tuesday, Sidewalk laid out a plan to invest a total of $50 million for the next planning stage of the deal. Waterfront Toronto, a development and revitalization agency established in 2001 with government-appointed board members, agreed to negotiate intellectual property ownership and digital privacy rights based on a set of “guiding principles” emphasizing people’s control over their own information.

Privacy watchdogs have questioned who will control sensitive digital information as residents are tracked by sensors that may be embedded in such infrastructure as traffic lights, thermostats and garbage-disposal units. Also at issue are ownership rights over any products or techniques developed at the site and sold elsewhere.

“Is the public getting back from the project the appropriate level of value in terms of money and public policy objectives like public housing?” said Richard Joy, executive director of the Toronto chapter of real estate and land development nonprofit, the Urban Land Institute. “It’s brand new territory, and perhaps one for which we don’t have a very good measure yet.”

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, left, laughs with Dan Doctoroff, chief executive of Sidewalk Labs, during an event in Toronto on Oct. 17, 2017.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, left, laughs with Dan Doctoroff, chief executive of Sidewalk Labs, during an event in Toronto on Oct. 17, 2017. PHOTO: COLE BURSTON/BLOOMBERG NEWS

The Toronto waterfront is Sidewalk’s first and only major project since the business was launched in 2015 by Dan Doctoroff, a former investment banker who became deputy mayor for economic development in New York City and then CEO of Bloomberg LP. Waterfront Toronto announced the undertaking with fanfare at an unveiling last October attended by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Alphabet’s former Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt.

Though the project will be open to other tech companies, it also could allow Alphabet to incorporate some early ideas it gleaned from developing things like driverless cars, connected thermostats and security cameras.

Last month, the CEO of Waterfront Toronto, Will Fleissig, resigned after clashes with the board. Some board members expressed concern that he wasn’t sharing enough information about the project with them, people familiar with the matter said. His departure removed a key Sidewalk ally from Waterfront, just as opposition to the undertaking was growing.

On Monday, Waterfront board member Julie Di Lorenzo also resigned. She said in an interview that she wasn’t getting complete answers to her questions about issues such as the privacy rights of residents if they didn’t agree to share data. “Would you segregate them and tell them ’You can’t live here?’”

Toronto Mayor John Tory downplayed Waterfront’s management changes and said the Sidewalk project remains on track. “I happen to believe this is a great opportunity for Toronto and for Sidewalk,” he said.

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau looks at city models built by children before a press conference where Alphabet announced the project. Nearly 10 months after the project was announced—even some supporters say they have little concrete idea of what Sidewalk is planning.
Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau looks at city models built by children before a press conference where Alphabet announced the project. Nearly 10 months after the project was announced—even some supporters say they have little concrete idea of what Sidewalk is planning. PHOTO: MARK BLINCH/REUTERS

Waterfront Toronto’s privacy counsel Chantal Bernier said data privacy will be a major issue in the coming negotiations.

“The markers have been set for privacy protection through the project,” she said.

Nearly 10 months after the project was announced—even some supporters say they have little concrete idea of what Sidewalk is planning.

“There is a lot of work to do to rebuild confidence in this project,” said Kurtis McBride, CEO of Miovision Technologies Inc., a Kitchener, Ontario-based technology company that measures and analyzes street traffic for North American cities.

Mr. McBride sits on an advisory board created to help Waterfront Toronto navigate questions about digital rights. Public confidence has quickly eroded in the project, he said, because there is little information about how it will use the data it collects.

The idea that a private company is helping decide matters of public policy also is concerning to public advocates, said Bianca Wylie, a technology policy adviser who has been critical of the project. “We need to have these issues decided by organizations that are accountable to the people, not by private vendors,” she said.

Sidewalk has been reaching out to government officials in the months since it won the Toronto bid. Sidewalk executives have held meetings with city councilors, and the company has put on public talks for residents featuring academics and industry executives discussing issues like urban housing and street design.

Kristyn Wong-Tam, a city councilor who represents 100,000 people in Toronto’s downtown core, said Sidewalk officials met with her on March 7, but offered little meaningful information.

“I left the meeting with more questions,” she said.

Write to Vipal Monga at and Jacquie McNish at

Source : Read more

CBS News Admits, 5G Is Already Causing Staggering Health Problems: ‘A Health Calamity Unlike Anything America Has Ever Seen Before Is Waiting And Could Happen Fast’


 ‘Microwave Bath’ Sure To Cause Cancer Nationwide Can Be Nothing Less Than Intentional

By Stefan Stanford – All News Pipeline – Live Free Or Die
In this new story over at Forbidden Knowledge TV that Steve Quayle linked to on his website Wednesday morning they reported that the roll out of 5G is already causing staggering health problems after firefighters in several different California counties from San Francisco to Sacramento to Los Angeles reported neurological damage, headaches, insomnia, memory problems and confusion soon after 5G equipment was installed outside of their fire stations.

And while one wouldn’t blame the reader for thinking that story might be some bizarre ‘conspiracy theory’, back on May 29th of this year, CBS Sacramento reported that major health risk questions have been raised about the roll out of 5G just months before Sacramento officially launches 5G services and their story indeed reports:

Firefighters in San Francisco have reported memory problems and confusion after the 5G equipment was installed outside of fire stations. The firefighters claim the symptoms stopped when they relocated to stations without equipment nearby.

As the Forbidden Knowledge TV story also reported, when the firefighters were tested, they were found to have brain abnormalities and measurable neurological deficits and as this January story over at CBS San Francisco reported, California firefighters have now been exempted from the installment of 5G equipment near their fire stations.
Yet as the CBS San Francisco story also pointed out, 5G equipment is also being installed around homes, churches, schools, hospitals, stores, office parks and all across the country. Are firefighters somehow specifically vulnerable to the negative health effects of 5G in a way that, for some strange reason, the rest of us aren’t?

Of course that last statement was facetious and knowing that firefighters in California will be exempted from having 5G equipment installed upon their fire houses due to proven negative health effects should be looked at as a red-alert warning call to us all. If firefighters don’t want this equipment near their stations, why would we want it near our homes? While supporters and ‘pushers’ of 5G claim that it is safe, the International Association of Firefighters disagrees. From the CBS San Francisco story:

The International Association of Firefighters began opposing cell towers on fire stations, after firefighters complained of health problems.

“These firefighters developed symptoms,” says Dr. Gunnar Heuser who conducted a pilot study on firefighters at a station with cell towers.

“The symptoms included problems with memory, problems with intermittent confusion, problems with weakness,” Heuser said.

Heuser says their brain scans suggest even low-level RF can cause cell damage and he worries about more vulnerable groups like kids.

“We found abnormal brain function in all of the firefighters we examined,” Heuser said.

With an organization as credible as the International Association of Firefighters opposing the roll out of 5G near their fire stations for very obvious reasons, why is it still being rolled out in very close proximity to peoples homes, our children’s schools, and places such as near doctors offices all across America?

As we reported within this April 5th ANP story, while the mainstream media as a whole has been noticeably silent about the dangers of 5G, local outlets such as the previously mentioned CBS outlets in California have been publishing a number of stories about the dangers warned of by experts and ‘normal citizens’ alike.

The following excerpt came to us from an April story over at WTOP in Washington DC in which we learn a number of residents of the DC suburb of Montgomery County are fighting a change to the zoning laws that would allow 5G wireless system antennas to be placed upon utility poles and buildings, often within a stones throw of houses and schools. From WTOP:

“Our quiet suburban neighborhood is being targeted for 16 cell towers to be installed within 20 feet of our homes,” said Donna Baron, a resident of North Potomac during a county council public hearing Tuesday night. “North Potomac is being targeted for a total of 61 cell towers.”

“These 5G towers would emit radio frequency radiation into our yards, our homes and our bodies, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year,” said Baron, urging thecounty council to reject zoning law changes that would permit the cell antennas.

Other residents expressed alarm and concern over the health risks they said could ensue from cell antennas placed as near as 20 feet from homes. “We are very concerned about the placement of wireless antennas in places where people play, sleep and work,” said Theodora Scarato, executive director of Environmental Health Trust. “There are hundreds of scientists who have concluded that this is a risk.”

As Zero5G reports, there is NO ‘safe level’ of 5G or wireless radiation for people, animals, or nature and even though we are unable to actually ‘see’ microwaves or electromagnetism, radio-frequency (RF) waves & electromagnetic microwave radiation (EMR), they remain a signicant source of harmful and even deadly ‘pollution’.

And while some might call it a stretch to call the invisible radiation that will be permeating the planet with the proliferation of 5G ‘invisible killing fields‘, as we reported on ANP all the way back in July of 2017, the website ‘Electric Sense’ published a story titled “11 Reasons To Be Concerned About 5G Dangers” within which they listed numerous health hazards we’ll face from the roll out of this new technology across America.:

Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:

DNA single and double strand breaks
oxidative damage
disruption of cell metabolism
increased blood brain barrier permeability
melatonin reduction
disruption to brain glucose metabolism
generation of stress proteins

And as we reported on ANP back on June 3rd, 5G technology is ‘silent weapon technology’, capable of being used in military crowd control weaponry, and it’s being placed in neighborhood’s across America. Dane Wigington from Geoengineering Watch had a very, very interesting theory about its roll out.:

Our government continues to do anything they want to the climate, and the planet as a whole. The push to saturate the biosphere with highly destructive 5G transmissions is the most recent alarming example. 5G frequencies are also used for crowd control. Is the power structure preparing for what they certainly know is inevitable? Unfolding global chaos?

So once again, why is 5G tech being fast-tracked into neighborhoods and near schools and other locations of mass gatherings all across America when we have proof of the negative health effects of 5G, and that not from some tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists but the International Association of Firefighters?

And firefighters aren’t the only ones speaking out. A group of well over 100 scientists studying in the fields of biological and health effects from non-ionizing EMF fields have signed an international appeal for 5G to be studied more closely before it is rolled out all across the planet, warning of the potential dangers. From their appeal:

We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcastantennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).

Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.

These findings justify our appeal to the United Nations (UN) and, all member States in the world, to encourage the World Health Organization (WHO) to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures, and educating the public about health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal development. By not taking action, the WHO is failing to fulfill its role as the preeminent international public health agency.


And while 5G will continue to be rolled out across America due to the billions and billions of dollars that it will bring in according to former FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler as heard in the final video below, a video titled “The Scariest 3 1/2 Minutes Ever!“, as we also hear from Wheeler, 5G is far too important to the globalists agenda to waste too much time testing it properly to make sure it is safe.

And we’ll close by republishing two excellent and eye-opening comments from this CBS Sacramento story  within which they warned of some of the potential future health problems that will come along with the roll out of 5G.:

Dave Lynch May 30, 2018 at 4:31 pm The 5G system is population extermination and profiteering disguised as communications. I am not surprised considering the lousy leadership in California. With so many smart people in the world, surely a better method is available, but a microwave bath certain to cause cancer can be nothing more than intentional. I urge all Californians to ban the 5G system. All your cancer awareness programs and fund raisers are an utter waste of time with these towers in operation. Think about that one for a minute,

Kelley Eidem July 16, 2018 at 7:31 pm What happened to the firefighters when they were exposed to 5G early is the sort of thing I’ve been warning about on my Facebook Timeline (Kelley Eidem) for several months now. To see a news article about it, brings it home. By the way, the immediate threats are the ions that the towers generate. Frequencies can be just fine if the ions are neutralized. The ions can be neutralized by adding ceramic to each mast. Otherwise there will be a calamity unlike what this country has ever seen and it will happen fast.

NOTE TO READERSANP Needs Your Help. With digital media revenue spiraling downward, especially hitting those in Independent Media, it has become apparent that traditional advertising simply isn’t going to fully cover the costs and expenses for many smaller independent websites.

LSL- ALERT!! 5G Micro-Cell Towers have started being installed in Penticton Share this !!

2 Videos below 
ALERT ready 5G micro-cell towers are already being installed in Penticton and there has been no notice to residents of the installation or to the potential health concerns because of extremely high radiation. So far we just found 4 of them but we need to put a stop to this. Call the city and voice your concerns
From what we know they are still operating the 4G but are 5G ready
No where in Penticton even though Telus has got you to sign up to 5G is it being used
We will be hosting a Public Forum at the Cleland Theater very shorty date to be determined but the 2nd video shows the city has endorsed it
In the next elections we need a Mayor and councilors that can stand up to the Telecom and Big Corp industries and SAY NO to 5G
HERE IS EMAILS for City as well PHONE THE CITY and demand to know whats going on and voice your concerns
phone number – Phone: 250-490-2400,,,,,,
Andrew Jakubiet <>,,
Mitch Moroziuk <>
Here is email list of newspapers
penticton western <>,,
James Miller <>,
Colin Dacre <>,
#stop5g #Stop5gUK Stop5G #Stop5GPenticton

subscribe to our Youtube channel to stay update on videos –

and follow our website Locals Supporting Locals for news /videos on this issue and many other issues-

Kevin Proteau
cell: 250-770-9789

‘Movie and chat’ on 5G Is it Dangerous ???Penticton

The safety of 5G technology will be the focus of a community meeting Tuesday night at Craft Corner Kitchen.

Locals Supporting Locals is hosting the event, which will kick off at 8 p.m. with a movie regarding 5G, which is the newest, fastest form of wireless internet service being rolled out for smartphones.

“Because we believe this is an election issue… we (invited) all current and upcoming city councillors and mayors to attend and learn what the research is saying and hear the questions and concerns of Penticton citizens regarding this new technology and the required installation of hundreds of micro-cell towers to support it,” the group said in a press release.

“Many of us are still learning and gathering information that mainstream media doesn’t make easily available. Living in the era of the citizen journalist makes that sequestered information accessible but one must have a curiosity and desire to know and understand.

Kenvin's poster (1)

Supporting Locals and giving voice to business, farmers and individuals in harmony with local values!

%d bloggers like this: