Is Assisted Suicide Part of NWO Agenda?
June 4, 2016
“The State has given life and the State has taken it away … blessed be the State!”
The legalization of ‘medical assistance in dying’
is ‘New World Order’ policy. As is typical, Canada
is on of the vanguard of the coming dystopia.
(Disclaimer: I favor medically assisted suicide but Oliver raises valid concerns.)
“I suppose it can’t be that difficult to euthanize a population, if you have already lobotomized them. “
by Oliver Heydorn
As I write this, Canada is on the verge of legalizing both euthanasia and assisted suicide under the euphemism of “medical assistance in dying”.
The Supreme Court struck down the ban on assisted suicide last year as “unconstitutional” in yet another example of judicial activism and interference forcing Parliament to draft a new law. In principle, Parliament could invoke the ‘notwithstanding clause’, but, with someone of the low intellectual and moral calibre of Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, there is no prospect of being rescued by the executive branch.
While I think the typical arguments raised by the pro-euthanasia crowd are easy to dismiss, this development that should be of great concern.
The legalization of ‘medical assistance in dying’ is ‘New World Order’ policy. As is typical, Canada is on of the vanguard of the coming dystopia.
While advanced in the name of such ‘feel-good’ concepts as ‘freedom’, ‘privacy’, ‘compassion’, or other words that might cause the unthinking to salivate, legalized euthanasia is an egregious breach with the tradition of civilization and, like all such violations, is never as innocent as it is made out to be. Long-term political agendas are being served, namely the further centralization of power in the hands of a national and international oligarchy.
According to the proposed law, voluntary euthanasia will be made legal for competent patients who 1) ‘clearly consent to the termination of life’ and 2) ‘have a grievous and irremediable medical condition that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition’.
The language is so vague and the “safeguards” so low that it would be easy for doctors to kill people and then to claim afterwards that they consented to it, amongst other possible abuses.Alex Schadenberg has some good informatiom on this.
Incidentally, as I understand it, the “deadline” – no pun intend – that the Supreme Court has set for legalization (with or without a law) is this Monday, the sixth day, of the sixth month, of a year ending in six … surely this is not an accident.
WHO IS “KILLABLE”?
The state has now arrogated to itself the right to divide the population into two categories: those who are ‘killable’ and those who are not ‘killable’ (because they are deemed ‘worthy of life’), and it has also assumed the right to determine whether or not its criteria are met in any particular case. The State, or, more precisely, the representatives of the State (i.e., legal officials, doctors, etc.), will now become the arbiters of life and death.
Since innocent post-partum human life will no longer be something of unconditional value in the eyes of the law, as something sacrosanct that is beyond the jurisdiction of the law, the parameters of “who ought to live” and “who ought to die” can, of course be changed as circumstances or political agendas change.
Before, not even the State could legally sanction or effect the death of an innocent human person after birth. Now, the State has the power not only to do both, but to change at will the conditions under which people might be killed or otherwise ‘suicided’.
In brief, legalized euthanasia sets a terrible precedent. What we are looking at here is nothing less than creeping (and creepy) Totalitarianism: “First they came for the so-called incurables, and I was not an incurable, so I did not speak out …”
In the meantime, the bulk of the Canadian public sleep on, like the anaesthetized automatons that our oligarchic elites think they are. I suppose it can’t be that difficult to euthanize a population, if you have already lobotomized them.
Be that as it may, I do find it incredible that people, when not indifferent to these types of ethical and legal questions, can be so easily brainwashed into acting as cheerleaders for NWO policies whose sole purpose is to disenfranchise them. They cheerfully consent to what can only be described as a metaphysical rape provided that it is sold to them in the name of “progress”, “dignity”, “freedom”, and “equality”, etc.
Perhaps they deserve what is coming to them after all.
M. Oliver Heydorn, left, graduated summa cum laude with a Ph.D. in philosophy from the International Academy of Philosophy at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. The IAP is dedicated to the study and promotion of realist phenomenology and other closely related schools of continental thought. For ten years, Dr. Heydorn taught philosophy to undergraduates at three different institutions in three different countries. His articles have appeared in both scholarly and more popular media. He is the author of Social Credit Economics, The Economics of Social Credit and Catholic Social Teaching, and, more recently, Social Credit Philosophy.
Oliver adds: Another aspect of this issue: as our rulers increase the pressure on people and artificially build up the tension in their lives – I swear that life was much simpler in 1986! – through constant economic stresses, social engineering (trans and homosexual ideology being shoved down people’s throats, alongside feminism, multiculturalism, etc.), GMO’s, Chemtrails, vaccines, etc., Al-Qaeda ‘terrorism’ and now that of ISIS, etc., etc., legalizing things like euthanasia and assisted suicide also provides a release valve while serving another objective: depopulation.
The message? “Yes the world is going to hell in a hand basket, but at least now you will be able to get the doctors to out your light!” Once introduced and progressively widened, it’s conceivable that such practices will eventually become culturally normalized or even expected. The Illuminati will be quite happy to see more and more people out their lights, with or without medical help. It saves them the trouble. It’s the same modus operandi: get the people to do it to themselves and make them think it was their idea.
Don’t ge me wrong, I have great compassion for people who are suffering from some terrible terminal illness or condition. At the same time, I am convinced that there are many effective alternative treatments that are being suppressed or ignored by the conventional medical community. Ty Bollinger did a great job just recently with his series of documentaries dealing with effective cancer cures: https://thetruthaboutcancer.com. Also, a palliative care doctor that spoke to a group of us last week told us that with effective palliative care virtually all dying people can have their pain kept in check if not completely eliminated and that the small number (less than 5%) who might not derive the expected benefit from pain killers can be sedated if necessary. A lot of the time it is access to that palliative care that is lacking.
First Comment from Dan: “If anyone tells you State termination of life is going to remain voluntary, tell them they’re an idiot. “More people are killing themselves in the US, Canada and UK than ever. Last month the CNN ran this headline; U.S. suicide rates on the rise – Do you think those people needed an appointment with a doctor to be “granted a mercy death”?
Listen folks. We’re not cats and dogs. When a human being is really ready to end their life, they do the act themselves. The exception is people who are already flat on their back, being kept alive by doctors to begin with. That’s how they get “State assisted suicide” accepted. But in every State that’s made it legal within the last ten years, they’ve already moved to “allowing” perfectly healthy people who want to die.
BELGIUM let’s doctors kill healthy people for “unbearable psychological suffering.” One such case was the ‘trans man’ (woman who wanted to be a man) who became depressed after “sex reassignment” surgery. Euthanasia for emotional pain: Mercy or a “culture of death”?
This origin of the idea goes back a hundred years. The Euthanasia ‘movement’ was a dream of the Fabian Society think tank, funded in the United States at Rockefeller-Carnegie funded research facility at Cold Harbor, New York. State sterilization of certain people was legalized in several states exactly the same way as Gay ‘Marriage’ was a few years ago. The German branch of the Eugenics movement took on the job of R&D of State “mercy death” for those “unworthy of life” during the late 1930’s. Hitler had to cancel the T-4 Euthanasia program on August 18, 1941, due to public outcry by German Catholics, but secretly the operation was carried on in Poland.
First Comment from B
I worked for over 35 years in major Detroit area hospital Intensive care units. This is absolutely nothing new but only the legalization of what we have been already doing. White coat murder has gone public and has become fashionable.
Early termination of life comes under many labels including but not limited to:
1) Deceiving loved ones to sign a DNR directive by telling them how traumatic and cruel a CPR is “I wouldn’t want put my Mother through this……..they will break bones…………She will have pain” this may happen even when the patient is of sound mind.
I ask: is pain is the worst thing that can happen to a person?????? What about Hell??!!!
2) Getting (bullying, manipulation, coercion, browbeating and guilting……………………………..) the family to donate organs which most assuredly will alter the definition of death to make sure the organs are viable.
3) Palliative care.
5) The staff overrides the family’s wishes by quietly doing what they call: “slow codes” or “walking codes”
6) A complete redefinition of life and death to justify abortion, euthanasia, and premature organ harvesting (yes this absolutely happens).
Henry this has been going on for years and years and I have been retired for almost 20 years so God knows what they are doing now.
Who is the ultimate killer? The synonym for “The thief” is Satan.
John 10:10 “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.”