John McAfee on Russian hacking allegations: “If it looks like the Russians did it, then I can guarantee you it was not the Russians”

Following the release of an FBI report outlining Russia’s alleged role in hacking the 2016 election, Larry King sat down to talk with tech pioneer John McAfee to discuss the current state of cybersecurity.

McAfee is no stranger to cybersecurity. As the developer of the first commercial antivirus program, he has been a major player in the industry for the past 50 years. He is also the CEO of MGT Capital Investments, and an outspoken former presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party.

Based on all of his experience, McAfee does not believe that Russians were behind the hacks on the Democratic National Committee (DNC), John Podesta’s emails, and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. As he told RT, “if it looks like the Russians did it, then I can guarantee you it was not the Russians.”

The Joint Analysis Report from the FBI contains an appendix that lists hundreds of IP addresses that were supposedly “used by Russian civilian and military intelligence services.” While some of those IP addresses are from Russia, the majority are from all over the world, which means that the hackers constantly faked their location.

Has the WHO EMF Project been hijacked by ICNIRP?

Please Sign this VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE for WHO and its EMF Project


Has the WHO EMF Project been hijacked by ICNIRP?
We demand that:  Emilie van Deventer be immediately replaced because she has publicized her support for the wireless telecommunications industry and has a major conflict of interest, given her industry-funded research aimed at promoting and advancing wireless communication technology.

Please Sign this VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE for WHO and its EMF Project



Yes, a percentage of the population–a growing percentage–is being made physically sick by exposure to wireless radiation waves. Invisible but deadly. For some–the torture is readily apparent to them. For others, it will accumulate over time and manifest as cancer or some neurological or immune issue. Those affected are being tortured and ignored.

Cellular Deception

As the global push to sell us faster data intensifies, cell antennas are being installed on utility poles right by our homes, often without our knowledge or consent. Science warns that the artificial electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) these microcells emit disrupts wildlife, humans, and all living cells.

STEALTH CANADA—deep-sixing the science on wireless radiation

Teachers, too, are being challenged to become empowered. If they dare to test the levels of radiation coming from Wi-Fi routers in their school, to protect their own health as well as the health of the schoolchildren, or if they turn the router off when not in use, they can lose their job.

Here is an up-to-date 154-page pdf compendium of various MDs’, MD groups’, and PhDs’ correspondence and postings regarding Wi-Fi radiation in schools.

A Father Speaks About Wi-Fi in Schools and His Children’s Health

This father, Rodney Palmer, describes what happened after wireless Internet was installed in his child’s elementary school. Children got headaches, suffered heart irregularities and more. He describes how he went to the school administrators and even offered to pay for safe technology.

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video CASUALTIES OF WAVES – A film by Jean-Yves BILIEN


Preview YouTube video Cellular Deception

Cellular Deception

Preview YouTube video A Father Speaks About Wifi in Schools and His Children’s Health

2016 Newsmaker of the Year: David Kampe

David Kampi

Posted: Sunday, January 1, 2017 4:31 pm

It’s challenging writing a story without a direct quote from the subject.

David Kampe doesn’t grant interviews or pose for photos. Press releases are all skillfully worded and approved in advance. The only photo the media has available is a black-and-white portrait taken while he was on holidays.

Yet everybody knows him in the community even though few have met him.

Described by those close to him as shy and “a man of few words,” David Kampe’s actions speak louder than words.

The owner of Peter Bros. Construction and Inland Contracting was voted the South Okanagan’s Newsmaker of the Year for 2016 by online readers and print customers of The Penticton Herald.

In April 2016, Kampe unexpectedly donated $3 million for a permanent MRI machine at Penticton Regional Hospital which was not part of the present PRH fundraising campaign.

Patients in the South Okanagan-Similkameen are currently serviced by a mobile MRI van, which is shared with communities in the Kootenays. It is stationed at PRH only two weeks each month.

The inclusion of a fixed MRI in Penticton will allow regional patients to have uninterrupted access to the machine.

MRI is the commonly used acronym for “magnetic resonance imaging” of body tissues which don’t show up in X-rays or other scans.

Dr. Stacey Piche, radiologist and medical director of medical imaging at PRH, said the impact of Kampe’s gift cannot be overstated.

“Getting the appropriate imaging examination in a timely fashion can be critical in making the correct diagnosis and initiating lifesaving treatment,” she said.

Piche added the fixed MRI particularly helps the most vulnerable, including cancer and stroke patients, and children.

Kampe has been the biggest booster in the community for the PRH expansion.

He previously donated property at Industrial Avenue and Camrose Street valued in 2011 at $1.5 million. In 2015 he donated $2 million directly towards the $20 million patient care tower project which presently sits at $12.5 million to date.

To date his contributions to Penticton Regional Hospital have eclipsed $6.5 million.

Penticton-based Peters Bros. Construction is among the top paving contractors in British Columbia. Although based in the Okanagan, the company performs work throughout the entire province. Peters Bros. has been previously recognized by the Ministry of Transportation with multiple awards for Excellence in Paving throughout B.C. Inland Contracting and Peters Bros.,were founded in the late 1970s and often employ more than 200 people province-wide, including Penticton.

Kampe’s philanthropy extends well beyond the hospital.

He continually sponsors the headlining artists at the Penticton Peach Festival, the annual grand parade, and the Snowbirds on years when they are available.

“David Kampe’s level of support is absolutely invaluable to the festival,” Peachfest president Don Kendall said, Sunday. “Since he’s become more involved over the past seven or eight years it’s taken the festival to a new level. He’s been instrumental in making Peachfest the largest free five-day festival in Canada. I can’t say enough about him.”

Headliners over the past several years have included Trooper, George Canyon, Honeymoon Suite, Chilliwack, and Emerson Drive.

The fact Peachfest is free, alcohol-free and a family oriented are reasons for Kampe’s continued support for the event, Kendall said. Kampe’s generosity has encouraged other local businesses to step forward and sponsor other events at the festival.

Peters Bros. is also active with the Penticton Vees junior A hockey team, paying for all children’s admissions for both the regular season and playoffs.

“Dave has meant so much to the Vees and the entire community,” Vees president and head coach Fred Harbinson said, Sunday.

“His contributions to allow local kids to enjoy Vees hockey these past few seasons have been a massive game changer to the atmosphere at the SOEC. Dave truly cares about Penticton and I appreciate all that he does for our community.”

Other significant contributions by Kampe in 2016 included replacement of aging computers, iPods and laptops at the OSNS Child and Youth Development Centre and a donation to KVR Middle School to purchase jackets for its girls’ basketball team.

Many of the other donations to other causes by Kampe remain anonymous.

Kampe received 53 per cent of the 901 votes cast in our 14th annual readership poll. Save Skaha Park and Nelson Meikle, both working independently of one another on community activism, were second with 29 per cent, and Penticton City Council third with 13 per cent. Five other nominees shared five per cent of the remaining votes.

Previous winners

The following is a list of previous Newsmakers of the Year:

• 2003: Mother Nature

• 2004: Save Penticton’s Agriculture from Division and Extinction

• 2005: Frank the Baggage Handler

• 2006: Jake Kimberley

• 2007: Kristi Richards

• 2008 Captain Jonathan Snyder

• 2009: Tom Siddon

• 2010: Duncan Keith

• 2011: Rita Chretien

• 2012: Adam Fitzpatrick

• 2013: John Vassilaki

• 2014: Elvena Slump

• 2015: Penticton City Council

read more

Cap and trade catastrophe for Canadians

Cap and trade catastrophe

Lorrie Goldstein

Yesterday at 4:25 PM

Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne. (JACK BOLAND, Toronto Sun)


Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne’s cap and trade scheme goes into effect Sunday, Jan. 1. Here are eight major reasons why you should be alarmed.


1. Costs appear to be higher than estimated

The Wynne government estimates the initial cost of cap and trade per household will be $156 per year, due to increased costs for gasoline ($8 per month) and natural gas home heating fuel ($5 per month), rising to $285 annually in 2019 in direct and indirect costs. However, its own estimate that it will take in $2 billion annually from cap and trade ($8 billion from 2017 to 2020) suggests the real annual cost to Ontarians will be $400 per household, given that Ontario has about five million households. The Ontario Energy Board says the initial increase in homeowners’ heating bills alone — which won’t be listed as a separate charge — will be $5.68 to $6.70 per month, already up to 34% higher than the government’s claim.

2. No transparency

Unlike a carbon tax, which is visible, cap-and-trade raises the prices of most goods and services, since most consume fossil fuel energy. Businesses pass along their increased costs from having to buy carbon allowances from the government or their competitors, by raising their prices. Since the price of consumer goods is determined by numerous factors, Ontarians will have no way of knowing what they are paying for cap and trade.

3. Severe impact on low-income Ontarians

Cap and trade is essentially a hidden tax on consumption. Since lower income earners, including seniors on fixed incomes, spend a larger proportion of their income on necessities, such as heating their homes in winter, cap and trade will disproportionately impact them in terms of costs. This even though their carbon footprints are relatively small because they consume less, tend to live in apartments as opposed to single family homes, take public transit as opposed to owning cars and do not engage in fossil-fuel intensive activities such as taking foreign vacations.

4. No revenue neutrality

While the government is promising to help Ontarians cope with the higher cost of living cap and trade causes, its scheme will not be revenue neutral, meaning it will not return to the public in the form of tax cuts or grants the $2 billion annually it intends to raise from carbon pricing. Instead of helping all Ontarians to cope with the higher cost of living, the government will pick winners and losers, which governments are notoriously bad at doing.

5. Limited effectiveness

Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk says cap and trade will only reduce Ontario’s industrial greenhouse gas emissions linked to climate change by 3.8 megatonnes annually by 2020, 20% of its 18.7 megatonnes target. The government claims the rest of its target, 14.9 megatonnes or 80%, will be achieved by counting emission reductions in California and Quebec resulting from Ontario’s entry into their cap and trade market in 2018.

6. Double counting emission cuts

Lysyk warns that since there is no agreement between California, Quebec and Ontario about how to report emission cuts under cap and trade, they may be double counted, undermining the credibility of Ontario’s reported cuts. For example, a business in California could sell 100 carbon allowances (each one permitting the bearer to emit one tonne of industrial carbon dioxide emissions or its equivalent) to an Ontario company. California could then record the sale of 100 carbon allowances as having lowered its emissions by 100 tonnes, because they’re being exported to Ontario. Meanwhile, Ontario could record the purchase of the same 100 credits by an Ontario company as having lowered Ontario’s emissions by 100 tonnes, because it lowered California’s emissions.

7. No verification of emission cuts

Ontario businesses emitting greenhouse gases are expected to pay up to $466 million more from 2017 to 2020 to buy carbon allowances from emitters in Quebec and California, which could rise to $2.2 billion by 2030. “Our concern with these payments,” Lysyk said, “is that the government has not adequately studied whether Ontario businesses buying these allowances will actually contribute to additional emissions reductions in Quebec and California.” As a result, “these funds may be leaving the Ontario economy for no purpose other than to help the government claim it has met a target.”

8. Potential misuse of free carbon allowances

The Wynne government is giving out free carbon allowances — essentially free money — to major Ontario industrial emitters because it says it has to protect them from foreign competition in jurisdictions that don’t have carbon pricing. But it has not explained what mechanism it has, if any, to prevent industries that receive free allowances from raising their prices as if they had paid for them, resulting in undeserved, windfall profits, as occurred in Europe’s cap and trade market, the Emissions Trading Scheme.

read more

Supporting Locals and giving voice to business, farmers and individuals in harmony with local values!

%d bloggers like this: