CBS News Admits, 5G Is Already Causing Staggering Health Problems: ‘A Health Calamity Unlike Anything America Has Ever Seen Before Is Waiting And Could Happen Fast’


 ‘Microwave Bath’ Sure To Cause Cancer Nationwide Can Be Nothing Less Than Intentional

By Stefan Stanford – All News Pipeline – Live Free Or Die
In this new story over at Forbidden Knowledge TV that Steve Quayle linked to on his website Wednesday morning they reported that the roll out of 5G is already causing staggering health problems after firefighters in several different California counties from San Francisco to Sacramento to Los Angeles reported neurological damage, headaches, insomnia, memory problems and confusion soon after 5G equipment was installed outside of their fire stations.

And while one wouldn’t blame the reader for thinking that story might be some bizarre ‘conspiracy theory’, back on May 29th of this year, CBS Sacramento reported that major health risk questions have been raised about the roll out of 5G just months before Sacramento officially launches 5G services and their story indeed reports:

Firefighters in San Francisco have reported memory problems and confusion after the 5G equipment was installed outside of fire stations. The firefighters claim the symptoms stopped when they relocated to stations without equipment nearby.

As the Forbidden Knowledge TV story also reported, when the firefighters were tested, they were found to have brain abnormalities and measurable neurological deficits and as this January story over at CBS San Francisco reported, California firefighters have now been exempted from the installment of 5G equipment near their fire stations.
Yet as the CBS San Francisco story also pointed out, 5G equipment is also being installed around homes, churches, schools, hospitals, stores, office parks and all across the country. Are firefighters somehow specifically vulnerable to the negative health effects of 5G in a way that, for some strange reason, the rest of us aren’t?

Of course that last statement was facetious and knowing that firefighters in California will be exempted from having 5G equipment installed upon their fire houses due to proven negative health effects should be looked at as a red-alert warning call to us all. If firefighters don’t want this equipment near their stations, why would we want it near our homes? While supporters and ‘pushers’ of 5G claim that it is safe, the International Association of Firefighters disagrees. From the CBS San Francisco story:

The International Association of Firefighters began opposing cell towers on fire stations, after firefighters complained of health problems.

“These firefighters developed symptoms,” says Dr. Gunnar Heuser who conducted a pilot study on firefighters at a station with cell towers.

“The symptoms included problems with memory, problems with intermittent confusion, problems with weakness,” Heuser said.

Heuser says their brain scans suggest even low-level RF can cause cell damage and he worries about more vulnerable groups like kids.

“We found abnormal brain function in all of the firefighters we examined,” Heuser said.

With an organization as credible as the International Association of Firefighters opposing the roll out of 5G near their fire stations for very obvious reasons, why is it still being rolled out in very close proximity to peoples homes, our children’s schools, and places such as near doctors offices all across America?

As we reported within this April 5th ANP story, while the mainstream media as a whole has been noticeably silent about the dangers of 5G, local outlets such as the previously mentioned CBS outlets in California have been publishing a number of stories about the dangers warned of by experts and ‘normal citizens’ alike.

The following excerpt came to us from an April story over at WTOP in Washington DC in which we learn a number of residents of the DC suburb of Montgomery County are fighting a change to the zoning laws that would allow 5G wireless system antennas to be placed upon utility poles and buildings, often within a stones throw of houses and schools. From WTOP:

“Our quiet suburban neighborhood is being targeted for 16 cell towers to be installed within 20 feet of our homes,” said Donna Baron, a resident of North Potomac during a county council public hearing Tuesday night. “North Potomac is being targeted for a total of 61 cell towers.”

“These 5G towers would emit radio frequency radiation into our yards, our homes and our bodies, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year,” said Baron, urging thecounty council to reject zoning law changes that would permit the cell antennas.

Other residents expressed alarm and concern over the health risks they said could ensue from cell antennas placed as near as 20 feet from homes. “We are very concerned about the placement of wireless antennas in places where people play, sleep and work,” said Theodora Scarato, executive director of Environmental Health Trust. “There are hundreds of scientists who have concluded that this is a risk.”

As Zero5G reports, there is NO ‘safe level’ of 5G or wireless radiation for people, animals, or nature and even though we are unable to actually ‘see’ microwaves or electromagnetism, radio-frequency (RF) waves & electromagnetic microwave radiation (EMR), they remain a signicant source of harmful and even deadly ‘pollution’.

And while some might call it a stretch to call the invisible radiation that will be permeating the planet with the proliferation of 5G ‘invisible killing fields‘, as we reported on ANP all the way back in July of 2017, the website ‘Electric Sense’ published a story titled “11 Reasons To Be Concerned About 5G Dangers” within which they listed numerous health hazards we’ll face from the roll out of this new technology across America.:

Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:

DNA single and double strand breaks
oxidative damage
disruption of cell metabolism
increased blood brain barrier permeability
melatonin reduction
disruption to brain glucose metabolism
generation of stress proteins

And as we reported on ANP back on June 3rd, 5G technology is ‘silent weapon technology’, capable of being used in military crowd control weaponry, and it’s being placed in neighborhood’s across America. Dane Wigington from Geoengineering Watch had a very, very interesting theory about its roll out.:

Our government continues to do anything they want to the climate, and the planet as a whole. The push to saturate the biosphere with highly destructive 5G transmissions is the most recent alarming example. 5G frequencies are also used for crowd control. Is the power structure preparing for what they certainly know is inevitable? Unfolding global chaos?

So once again, why is 5G tech being fast-tracked into neighborhoods and near schools and other locations of mass gatherings all across America when we have proof of the negative health effects of 5G, and that not from some tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists but the International Association of Firefighters?

And firefighters aren’t the only ones speaking out. A group of well over 100 scientists studying in the fields of biological and health effects from non-ionizing EMF fields have signed an international appeal for 5G to be studied more closely before it is rolled out all across the planet, warning of the potential dangers. From their appeal:

We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcastantennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).

Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.

These findings justify our appeal to the United Nations (UN) and, all member States in the world, to encourage the World Health Organization (WHO) to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures, and educating the public about health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal development. By not taking action, the WHO is failing to fulfill its role as the preeminent international public health agency.


And while 5G will continue to be rolled out across America due to the billions and billions of dollars that it will bring in according to former FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler as heard in the final video below, a video titled “The Scariest 3 1/2 Minutes Ever!“, as we also hear from Wheeler, 5G is far too important to the globalists agenda to waste too much time testing it properly to make sure it is safe.

And we’ll close by republishing two excellent and eye-opening comments from this CBS Sacramento story  within which they warned of some of the potential future health problems that will come along with the roll out of 5G.:

Dave Lynch May 30, 2018 at 4:31 pm The 5G system is population extermination and profiteering disguised as communications. I am not surprised considering the lousy leadership in California. With so many smart people in the world, surely a better method is available, but a microwave bath certain to cause cancer can be nothing more than intentional. I urge all Californians to ban the 5G system. All your cancer awareness programs and fund raisers are an utter waste of time with these towers in operation. Think about that one for a minute,

Kelley Eidem July 16, 2018 at 7:31 pm What happened to the firefighters when they were exposed to 5G early is the sort of thing I’ve been warning about on my Facebook Timeline (Kelley Eidem) for several months now. To see a news article about it, brings it home. By the way, the immediate threats are the ions that the towers generate. Frequencies can be just fine if the ions are neutralized. The ions can be neutralized by adding ceramic to each mast. Otherwise there will be a calamity unlike what this country has ever seen and it will happen fast.

NOTE TO READERSANP Needs Your Help. With digital media revenue spiraling downward, especially hitting those in Independent Media, it has become apparent that traditional advertising simply isn’t going to fully cover the costs and expenses for many smaller independent websites.

LSL- ALERT!! 5G Micro-Cell Towers have started being installed in Penticton Share this !!

2 Videos below 
ALERT ready 5G micro-cell towers are already being installed in Penticton and there has been no notice to residents of the installation or to the potential health concerns because of extremely high radiation. So far we just found 4 of them but we need to put a stop to this. Call the city and voice your concerns
From what we know they are still operating the 4G but are 5G ready
No where in Penticton even though Telus has got you to sign up to 5G is it being used
We will be hosting a Public Forum at the Cleland Theater very shorty date to be determined but the 2nd video shows the city has endorsed it
In the next elections we need a Mayor and councilors that can stand up to the Telecom and Big Corp industries and SAY NO to 5G
HERE IS EMAILS for City as well PHONE THE CITY and demand to know whats going on and voice your concerns
phone number – Phone: 250-490-2400,,,
Mitch Moroziuk <>
Here is email list of newspapers
penticton western <>,,
James Miller <>,
Colin Dacre <>,
#stop5g #Stop5gUK Stop5G #Stop5GPenticton

subscribe to our Youtube channel to stay update on videos –

and follow our website Locals Supporting Locals for news /videos on this issue and many other issues-

Kevin Proteau
cell: 250-770-9789

‘Movie and chat’ on 5G Is it Dangerous ???Penticton

The safety of 5G technology will be the focus of a community meeting Tuesday night at Craft Corner Kitchen.

Locals Supporting Locals is hosting the event, which will kick off at 8 p.m. with a movie regarding 5G, which is the newest, fastest form of wireless internet service being rolled out for smartphones.

“Because we believe this is an election issue… we (invited) all current and upcoming city councillors and mayors to attend and learn what the research is saying and hear the questions and concerns of Penticton citizens regarding this new technology and the required installation of hundreds of micro-cell towers to support it,” the group said in a press release.

“Many of us are still learning and gathering information that mainstream media doesn’t make easily available. Living in the era of the citizen journalist makes that sequestered information accessible but one must have a curiosity and desire to know and understand.

Kenvin's poster (1)

“Movie & Chat” Is 5G Technology safe?What we need to know – July 24 -Penticton

Please share

Kenvin's poster (1)

ConsumerWatch: 5G Cellphone Towers Signal Renewed Concerns Over Impacts on Health

We need to ask ourselves Do we want this technology here in Penticton. We will be forming a public forum in Penticton to show the health/safety and privacy issues

Join our – Stop 5G Penticton

OAKLAND (KPIX) — Is a cell tower going up in your neighborhood? If it’s not now, it may soon.Wireless carriers are installing millions of them across the country to enable the new, faster 5G cellphone technology. While many are looking forward to faster cell service, many are also asking: Are there legitimate health concerns?

Letter-Microwaves and Your Health in Penticton

To the Editor
Do you understand the science of microwaves?  Do you understand how microwaves affect all living things?  Do you have children?  Do you know anyone who is EMF (electro magnetic frequency) sensitive?  Do you understand how 5G can affect health & environment? Do you understand how 4G & other wireless modalities have affected many pets, children, adults & our environment?

Many of us are still learning & gathering information that mainstream media doesn’t make easily available.  Living in the era of the citizen journalist makes that sequestered information accessible but one must have a curiosity & desire to know & understand.  Should we believe industry generated “facts” regarding their technology?  “Industry seems immune to all of the science & medical experts warnings”.  (This quote from Dr Barrie Trower, a former UK Navy weapons researcher & directed energy expert) A further quote from Dr Trower: “ Every living thing on the planet is affected by microwaves except bacterium”.  Top scientists in 40 countries have signed a petition saying “you cannot do this” but mainstream media & industry have ignored this outcry.

Isn’t it time for us a community, parent, grandparent or just a concerned citizen  to start dialoguing about microwave technology & how it is affecting  every living thing?  Who has the courage to ask the hard questions?  The information is there for us to  discover but it will not be the industry who will give us the truth. It is always interesting to check the sources of information we are led to believe.    Start a conversation about what you know or don’t know regarding microwave technology, specifically 5th Generation (5G). Our health & that of  future generations is at stake.

Suzie Anderson


Firefighters Suffer Brain Damage Following Contact With 5G Cell Towers

Firefighters Suffer Brain Damage Following Contact With 5G Cell Towers reports of adverse effects from 5G come just days after major university study By: Riva Mendoza  |@NeonNettle on 13th July 2018 @ 4.00pm © press reports of adverse effects from 5G come just days after major university study


Firefighters Suffer Brain Damage Following Contact With 5G Cell Towers reports of adverse effects from 5G come just days after major university study By: Riva Mendoza  |@NeonNettle on 13th July 2018 @ 4.00pm © press reports of adverse effects from 5G come just days after major university study Firefighters in Sacramento, CA have reported brain damage including severe memory problems and confusion following the installation of new 5G cell towers outside the city fire station.The reports of adverse effects from 5G come just days after major university study into 5G wireless technology was a “massive health experiment” that hasn’t been properly tested by the government.

According to CBS report on the 5G small cell towers references complaints by the San Francisco firefighters:Firefighters in San Francisco have reported memory problems and confusion after the 5G equipment was installed outside of fire stations. The firefighters claim the symptoms stopped when they relocated to stations without equipment nearby.Firefighters are willing to run and leap and climb and jump into burning buildings and forests but they aren’t willing to suffer neurological damage after being subjected to prolonged periods of radiation exposure from 5G cell towers and antennas.

If firefighters aren’t willing to put up with the damaging effects of the 5G rollout, should we be more concerned about the health effects associated with the new wireless technology? © pressAccording to Activist Post: All sources of cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation are not magic.


They have never been. Decades of research from government, independent, industry, and military scientists have already proven harm.In 2011, The World Health Organization classified all sources of cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation as a possible carcinogen in the same category as chloroform, engine exhaust, and led.Many experts believe it should be reclassified as a Carcinogen.

This isn’t just about cancer. Exposure can lead to symptoms and illnesses referred to as “Microwave Sickness” or “Electrosensitivity.”This is actually more common than we have been led to believe.Research has confirmed that exposure can… Worsen pre-existing conditions even when it didn’t cause them Disrupt the blood-brain barrier which can cause it to leak Cause a cumulative toxic effect when combined with other toxins Harm pets, nature, and wildlife

It’s not just The Telecom Industry aka “Big Wireless” that doesn’t seem to care about any of this. Many of our elected officials, as well as current and former government employees, don’t seem to care either. © press20+-year-old legislation as well as outdated safety standards and testing– not science – has made it possible to avoid using “The Precautionary Principle” in regard to all digital and wireless devices, products, and infrastructure.Concerns about cell towers – 5G and otherwise – and other sources of WiFi radiation has been reported quite a bit already – especially over the last few months.In 2017, 180 scientists requested a moratorium on 5G small cell towers because of biological and environmental health risks.

Environmental organizations like the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) are also asking for assistance in opposing it.5G was recently installed in New York City and Dr. Naomi Wolf and many of her fans have been posting about this on social media.It doesn’t sound like a good time is being had by all.Those who want 5G can still have it without cell towers being installed all over their communities.Samsung will very soon be selling indoor 5G routers to anyone who doesn’t mind profuse sweating and other unpleasant side effects from exposure.Concerns about other sources of WiFi exposure have been reported for kids and everyone else and by a variety of media outlets and experts.In fact, cell phone manufacturers are warning their shareholders that they may eventually be held liable for the harm they have caused.If firefighters don’t want cell towers near their stations, why should anyone else want more of them near our homes and everywhere else?

Read more at:
© Neon Nettle

Nestlé’s Ice Mountain Bottled Water Leaves Nothing for Michigan’s Trout

Nestlé’s Ice Mountain Bottled Water Leaves Nothing for Michigan’s Trout

The company wants to increase its groundwater withdrawals to 400 gallons a minute—but the community’s citizen scientists say enough is enough.
A public gathering for a hearing on Nestlé’s groundwater pumping expansion at Ferris State University, April 2018Neil Blake,

Ankle deep in water, 83-year-old Jim Maturen unreeled his fishing line and watched it plunge into Michigan’s Chippewa Creek. Attached to the end was a thermometer. When the water’s temperature appeared on the display, retired surveyor John McLane scribbled down the reading on a piece of paper. The two men then moved on to another section of stream, then to five other spots along the Chippewa and another creek, the Twin. Later that month, they went back with a yardstick to measure the creeks’ depths. They were low. Too low for trout.

With their simple study, McLane and Maturen, a citizen scientist who worked in law enforcement for 31 years, wanted to show that trout can’t survive in these waterways. According to Maturen and a number of others who live close by, the beverage behemoth Nestlé is to blame. The company has been depleting the creeks’ groundwater sources for its Ice Mountain bottled water.

In Osceola Township, where Maturen conducted his tests, there isn’t a mountain—icy or otherwise—in sight, but Nestlé has been drawing hundreds of gallons from the ground for its Ice Mountain brand every minute for more than 15 years. Recently the state Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) approved Nestlé’s request to increase that withdrawal from 250 to 400 gallons per minute.

Nestlé’s Ice Mountain water bottles on the packaging line in Stanwood, Michigan. The company has been has been drawing hundreds of gallons out of Michigan’s ground every minute for more than 15 years.Garret Ellison,

“The good lord only made so many trout streams,” Maturen says. As a lifelong fisherman and conservationist, he knows what a trout stream looks like―and the current Chippewa and Twin aren’t it. According to DEQ records, trout swam in both of these creeks 18 years ago. Last summer, Maturen and McLane saw no fish at all.

They’re not the only ones concerned. After Nestlé asked the state to increase its allowance from the pump in 2016, public meetings drew hundreds—more than 600 by Maturen’s count—from not only the township but also Detroit and Flint, Michigan. DEQ also received more than 80,000 comments opposing Nestlé’s request and just 75 in favor.

Yet after months of review and what DEQ Director C. Heidi Grether called “the most extensive analysis of any water withdrawal in Michigan history,” the state approved Nestlé’s permit in April, as long as the company submits a monitoring plan and collects baseline data. If the DEQ approves the plan and deems the data adequate, Nestlé will be allowed to withdraw up to 400 gallons every minute from the ground in central Michigan to be bottled up.

Many environmental groups, including the Sierra Club and Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation (MCWC), say the state should have collected real-time data on the streams to get a better handle on the potential effects of removing more water. Nestlé’s own study, conducted in 2000 when the company was looking for natural springs, shows that the increase could lower water levels in streams and nearby wetlands. (The company did not respond to requests for comment.) The DEQ decision, say residents, shows how the state’s water policy puts private industry’s interests before the public’s.

Urge Michigan to lead the way toward stronger drinking water protections

Nestlé’s water bottling has run into problems in Michigan before. MCWC took the company to court in 2001 when residents of Mecosta County grew concerned over how the company’s groundwater pumping had changed Dead Stream and nearby wetlands. (Nestlé’s operation there and the one in Osecola Township draw from the same watershed.) Residents won the case, and Nestlé had to stop pumping there temporarily. After Nestlé appealed, a judge ruled in 2009 that the company could take an average 218 gallons per minute instead of the 400 it was originally allowed.

In 2008 Congress enacted the Great Lakes Compact, an agreement among eight states and two Canadian provinces to regulate water diversions from the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River Basin. Each state had to figure out how it was going to comply with the new law. For its part, Michigan decided to employ models to figure out how much a citizen, company, or farmer could take from a particular stream without causing damage. The models estimate how much that system has in reserve and how much can harmlessly be taken out.

That may sound good, but the state never has to check in real life whether a stream has slowed to a trickle because someone has sucked up too much water. “According to state law, it’s all about the spreadsheet,” says Patricia Norris, a natural resources policy professor at Michigan State University. But conducting real-time monitoring on every section of Michigan’s 30,000 miles of river would cost $18 million, according to some estimates, and the system wasn’t set up to police users, say water-use experts in the state. If someone sees a stream running low, however, she can bring a case to court. That’s what Peggy Case, president of MCWC, plans to do if necessary.

A gauge measuring water levels in Chippewa Creek in Osceola Township, MichiganCory Morse,

Case’s organization plans to legally challenge the permit to lay the groundwork for a trial. It will base its arguments on the precedent set by the Mecosta County case, information Nestlé provided to DEQ for its increased Osceola water withdrawal, and evidence that the company’s current water withdrawals are already causing damage.

“Privatization of water, in our view, is wrong. It belongs to the people and it belongs to the ecosystem,” says Case, even if state law doesn’t currently prevent it. As opposed to other types of water withdrawals, such as for farming, she says, “When you put it in bottles and ship it out of the watershed, it’s gone.” With enough evidence, which includes Maturen’s and McLane’s scribbles from the banks of the Chippewa and the Twin, Michiganders may be able to show that Nestlé is taking more out of the environment than just water.

Read more

“We are in a fight for our lives ” Natural remedies in Canada are currently facing their most significant threat to date.

shawn buckley fight for lives

Check out Shawn Buckley’s latest video recording (55 minute watch) released as part of our 2018 public and industry education phase. 60 days ago today, at Toronto’s Total Health Show, Shawn gave his new lecture called “Censorship, Science and Belief”. He shares compelling insight into the detrimental outcome of Health Canada’s proposed self-care regulatory framework for natural health products. Safe and effective natural remedies in Canada are currently facing their most significant threat to date. After 23 years of dealing with Health Canada Shawn tells us, “never have I felt more threatened.” Be able to personally speak to the facts and develop a full understanding through our new and popular educational material:

Shawn Buckley’s 2018 Total Health Show Lecture:

Discussion Paper | Repeal of NHP Regs — Renegotiating our Surrender:

Challenging CHFA | Rebuttal to Criticism:

Interviews with Robert Scott Bell and Hugh Reilly:

Vitality Magazine Article | NHPs Under Threat Once Again:

Total Health Show | New and Standard Educational Materials:

Supporting Locals and giving voice to business, farmers and individuals in harmony with local values!

%d bloggers like this: